Seriously, I've installed 3 applications in the last week. All three from (fairly) reputable companies...Two messenger apps (we'll call 'em BOL Instant Messenger and Woohoo! Messenger), and a music program (call it uTunes). Variably, among the three of them, they requested permission to do the following:
- Add a desktop shortcut
- Add a quick-launch shortcut
- Reside resident in the system tray
- Run at computer start-up
- Install various add-ons and 3rd-party riders
- Become the default application of their type on the system
In all cases, I went for the minimal install possible. See, I just wanted the Messengers, so I could shuffle and maintain my buddy-lists easily; I actually connect through my mobile device. I just wanted uTunes so I could occasionally buy music online. So I allowed the desktop shortcuts, but disabled all other options.
So, first thing that came to notice was, the installers invariably tried to trick me into re-selecting the un-checked options (or tried to slip them under my radar). Fine, I kept de-selecting them until I was satisfied. But the second part is what really blows my mind.
About 2/3 of the options went ahead and did their thing anyways
Isn't this the kind of crap that got RealPlayer such a lousy reputation? Don't these companies worry that offering buttons to disable the annoyware, but not making the buttons connect to anything, is gonna piss people off more than if they just didn't ask at all?
And my final question...what is supposed to be accomplished by this? Back to the earlier stalker-parallel...Do they think that if they pester you and popup to the foreground often enough, they'll eventually win you over? Do they think that no means yes? I'm sorry, but the application that does what I need it to, and then gets the hell out of the way is the one that gets return business from me.